Clean Run has published an article called “Tug: The Controversy” by Leslie Renaud in the May 2007 issue. To summarize, the author:
1. Gets annoyed when people tug with their dogs off lead after agility runs. She calls it “manufactured, misunderstood, and poorly managed arousal.” Also hates it when handlers don’t engage their dog when tugging. Apparently, it’s “painful” for her to watch a dog hanging off a tug toy if the handler is talking with someone, looking away, or has their back to the dog.
2. Believes that tugging helps with team bonding, behavior proofing, stress relief, and interactive reward.
Why the article is great:
1. Points out that if your dog sucks at tugging, she can still be a great agility dog.
Why the article sucks:
1. After reading about her over-aroused dog that she can’t tug with before runs and her dislike of improper tugging by others, the newbie agility handler still can’t answer the question: to tug or not to tug? And officially, she lists only 1 con, and 4 pros. Even so, the article reads like a condemnation of tugging. If you tug, you may very well create an over-aroused, difficult to manage agility monster. Scary!
My opinion:
1. I agree that you do NOT need to tug to be great at agility. Our dogs vary in affinity for tugging, but it is far easier to train with tugging than with food.
2. I agree that you should leash your dog before going back to your crate. I currently tug at the end of the run at the exit and/or just outside the ring briefly and leash my dog and then tug some more, or not, depending on the situation (rottie goes to crate for food, BC tugs more).
3. I disagree with the author’s call for active engagement of the dog while tugging. Tugging for stress relief and interactive reward does not require me to look at my dog while I tug.
As you can see, we mostly agree. But what is the point of the article? How does it help a new handler, or an experienced handler with a new pup who is thinking about tugging from the start, make a decision? It doesn’t.